E1 2500 vs A6 7400K
Description
The 2500 is based on Jaguar architecture while the 7400K is based on Steamroller.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the 7400K gets 34.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7400K is 3.8 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the 7400K gets 34.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7400K is 3.8 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
630f01
Core
Kabini
Kaveri
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
Socket FM2+
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
May 2013
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
6.64k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.13k points
34.28k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2500
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
2.35k
8.78k (x3.74)
Test#2 (FP)
2.21k
9.45k (x4.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
3.39k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
2.39k (x2.84)
TOTAL
6.64k
24.01k (x3.61)
Multithread
2500
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
13.5k (x4.1)
Test#2 (FP)
3.21k
12.17k (x3.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
5.96k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
2.65k (x3.04)
TOTAL
9.13k
34.28k (x3.75)
Performance/W
2500
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
208 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
214 points/W
187 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
117 points/W
92 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
609 points/W
527 points/W
Performance/GHz
2500
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
1679 points/GHz
2252 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1581 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
885 points/GHz
869 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
600 points/GHz
612 points/GHz
TOTAL
4745 points/GHz
6156 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4