E Series E-350 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The E-350 is based on Bobcat architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 3.7 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 3.7 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f10
f4a
Core
Zacate
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
-
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
18 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
- kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
January 2011
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
6.26k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.05k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-350
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
3.87k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
2.33k
8.17k (x3.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
2.67k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.74k
1.82k (x2.44)
TOTAL
6.26k
16.53k (x2.64)
Multithread
E-350
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2.84k
3.46k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
22.59k (x5.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.42k
8.09k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
2.85k (x3.17)
TOTAL
10.05k
37k (x3.68)
Performance/W
E-350
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
158 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
216 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
558 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-350
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
1115 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1454 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
879 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
465 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
3914 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4