E Series E-350 vs Celeron N3060
Description
The E-350 is based on Bobcat architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.3 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.3 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f10
406c4
Core
Zacate
Braswell
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
18 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
January 2011
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
6.26k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.05k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-350
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
4.68k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
2.33k
2.74k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
1.83k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.74k
0.9k (x1.21)
TOTAL
6.26k
10.15k (x1.62)
Multithread
E-350
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
2.84k
6.31k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
3.68k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.42k
2.46k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
0.91k (x1.01)
TOTAL
10.05k
13.36k (x1.33)
Performance/W
E-350
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
158 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
216 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
558 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-350
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1115 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1454 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
879 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
465 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
3914 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4