E Series E-350 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The E-350 is based on Bobcat architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.7 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.7 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f10
300f10
Core
Zacate
Llano
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
18 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2011
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.26k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.05k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-350
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
3.98k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
2.33k
4k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
2.05k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.74k
1.37k (x1.84)
TOTAL
6.26k
11.4k (x1.82)
Multithread
E-350
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
2.84k
5.74k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
6.05k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.42k
2.85k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.86k (x2.07)
TOTAL
10.05k
16.5k (x1.64)
Performance/W
E-350
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
158 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
216 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
558 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-350
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1115 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1454 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
879 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
465 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
3914 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4