C Series C-60 vs Core 2 Duo T7100
Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the T7100 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.5 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.5 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
6fd
Core
Ontario
Merom
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
9 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2011
May 2007
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
7.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
12.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
2.08k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
1.86k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
1.86k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
1.25k (x2.74)
TOTAL
4.79k
7.05k (x1.47)
Multithread
C-60
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
4.16k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
3.73k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
3.73k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
1.28k (x1.75)
TOTAL
8.53k
12.9k (x1.51)
Performance/W
C-60
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
119 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
107 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
3916 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4