C Series C-60 vs Atom N270
Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the N270 is based on Bonnell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the N270 gets 4.4 k points.
Summarizing, the C-60 is 1.9 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the N270 gets 4.4 k points.
Summarizing, the C-60 is 1.9 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
106c2
Core
Ontario
Diamondville
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
BGA 437
Cores/Threads
2/2
1 /2
TDP
9 W
3 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
512 kB
Date
August 2011
June 2008
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
3.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
4.43k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
C-60
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
0.66k
0.37k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
0.74k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.11k
0.73k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.52k
0.44k (x0.86)
TOTAL
4.2k
2.28k (x0.54)
Multithread
C-60
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
0.89k
0.55k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
2.67k
1.26k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
1.09k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.6k
0.47k (x0.79)
TOTAL
5.68k
3.37k (x0.59)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
1.02k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
0.85k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
0.93k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
0.37k (x0.82)
TOTAL
4.79k
3.18k (x0.66)
Multithread
C-60
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
1.31k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
1.36k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
1.33k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
0.42k (x0.57)
TOTAL
8.53k
4.43k (x0.52)
Performance/W
C-60
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
437 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
454 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
1477 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
580 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
234 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4