C Series C-60 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the SU7300 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.3 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.3 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
1067a
Core
Ontario
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
BGA 956
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
9 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2011
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
6.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
11.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
1.48k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
3.27k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
1.24k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
0.93k (x2.04)
TOTAL
4.79k
6.92k (x1.45)
Multithread
C-60
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.54k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
5.49k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.1k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
1.13k (x1.54)
TOTAL
8.53k
11.27k (x1.32)
Performance/W
C-60
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
210 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
1127 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
5325 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4