C Series C-60 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the TK-42 is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 1.5 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 1.5 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
60f82
Core
Ontario
Tyler
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Socket S1g1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
9 W
20 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2011
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
6.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
12.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
1.06k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.91k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
1.43k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
0.89k (x1.95)
TOTAL
4.79k
6.28k (x1.31)
Multithread
C-60
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
4.02k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
5.2k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.68k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
1k (x1.37)
TOTAL
8.53k
12.91k (x1.51)
Performance/W
C-60
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
201 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
645 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
662 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
555 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
3927 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4