Athlon 3000G vs Xeon E3-1220 v3
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell-WS
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
140.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
19.17k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
10.55k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
4.79k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
4.65k (x0.86)
TOTAL
43.82k
39.16k (x0.89)
Multithread
3000G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
73.13k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
42.06k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
18.03k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
7.54k (x1.34)
TOTAL
95.84k
140.76k (x1.47)
Performance/W
3000G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
1759 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4