Athlon 3000G vs Core i7-7660U
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7660U is 1.4 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7660U is 1.4 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
57.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
132.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
22.46k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
19.29k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
4.77k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
10.94k (x2.01)
TOTAL
43.82k
57.46k (x1.31)
Multithread
3000G
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
56.67k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
46.95k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
12.36k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
16.84k (x3)
TOTAL
95.84k
132.81k (x1.39)
Performance/W
3000G
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
3778 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
3130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
1122 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
8854 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
5614 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
4823 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
2735 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
14365 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4