Athlon 3000G vs Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 2.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 2.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e8
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
58.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
210.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
22.46k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
20.45k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
4.75k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
10.39k (x1.91)
TOTAL
43.82k
58.05k (x1.32)
Multithread
3000G
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
92.69k (x3.4)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
90.45k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
22.02k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
5.75k (x1.02)
TOTAL
95.84k
210.91k (x2.2)
Performance/W
3000G
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W