Athlon 3000G vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2019
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
21.2k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
25k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
11.44k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
24.22k (x4.46)
TOTAL
43.82k
81.87k (x1.87)
Multithread
3000G
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
145.13k (x5.32)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
198.36k (x4.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
85.67k (x6.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
5.79k (x1.03)
TOTAL
95.84k
434.96k (x4.54)
Performance/W
3000G
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4