Athlon 3000G vs Ryzen 5 4500U
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4500U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 4500U gets 194.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4500U is 2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 4500U gets 194.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4500U is 2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f01
Core
Picasso
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
52.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
194.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
15.37k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
23.02k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
7.74k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
6.32k (x1.16)
TOTAL
43.82k
52.44k (x1.2)
Multithread
3000G
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
52.52k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
99.84k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
36.42k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
5.56k (x0.99)
TOTAL
95.84k
194.34k (x2.03)
Performance/W
3000G
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
3502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
6656 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
2428 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
370 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
12956 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
3842 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1935 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
13111 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4