Athlon 3000G vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f10
Core
Picasso
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
14.2k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
23.23k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
5.35k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
5.18k (x0.95)
TOTAL
43.82k
47.96k (x1.09)
Multithread
3000G
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
58.24k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
105.72k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
28.73k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
5.59k (x1)
TOTAL
95.84k
198.27k (x2.07)
Performance/W
3000G
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4