Athlon 3000G vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
660f51
Core
Picasso
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
950
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
12.44k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
15.96k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
3.54k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
3k (x0.55)
TOTAL
43.82k
34.93k (x0.8)
Multithread
3000G
950
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
40.75k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
42.07k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
12.53k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
4.45k (x0.79)
TOTAL
95.84k
99.8k (x1.04)
Performance/W
3000G
950
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
950
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4