Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806c1
Core
Picasso
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
24.25k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
21.63k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
9.09k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
7.23k (x1.33)
TOTAL
43.82k
62.19k (x1.42)
Multithread
3000G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
56.9k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
55.68k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
19.29k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
6.09k (x1.08)
TOTAL
95.84k
137.96k (x1.44)
Performance/W
3000G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4