Athlon X4 950 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The 950 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 99.8 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 99.8 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
50657
Core
Bristol Ridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2016
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.93k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
99.8k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
950
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
12.44k
12.92k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
10.97k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.54k
2.54k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
5.09k (x1.7)
TOTAL
34.93k
31.52k (x0.9)
Multithread
950
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
40.75k
103.33k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
42.07k
87.67k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.53k
20.1k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
4.91k (x1.1)
TOTAL
99.8k
216.02k (x2.16)
Performance/W
950
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
627 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
647 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
193 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1535 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3274 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4199 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
931 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
788 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4