Athlon X4 950 vs Core i7-9850H
Description
The 950 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 99.8 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.9 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 99.8 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.9 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
906ed
Core
Bristol Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2016
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
34.93k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
99.8k points
289.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
950
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.44k
19.83k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
16.52k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.54k
3.87k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
9.02k (x3.01)
TOTAL
34.93k
49.24k (x1.41)
Multithread
950
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
40.75k
130.19k (x3.19)
Test#2 (FP)
42.07k
121.44k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.53k
28.05k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
9.62k (x2.16)
TOTAL
99.8k
289.3k (x2.9)
Performance/W
950
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
627 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
647 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
193 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
1535 points/W
6429 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
3274 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4199 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
931 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
788 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4