Athlon X4 950 vs Core i3-7130U
Description
The 950 is based on Excavator architecture while the i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 99.8 k points while the i3-7130U gets 90.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 99.8 k points while the i3-7130U gets 90.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
806e9
Core
Bristol Ridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2016
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
34.93k points
42k points
Mean multithread perf.
99.8k points
90.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
950
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.44k
17.82k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
16.18k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.54k
3.76k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
4.24k (x1.42)
TOTAL
34.93k
42k (x1.2)
Multithread
950
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
40.75k
40.25k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
42.07k
37.4k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.53k
9.07k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
4.17k (x0.94)
TOTAL
99.8k
90.89k (x0.91)
Performance/W
950
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
627 points/W
2683 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
647 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
193 points/W
605 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
278 points/W
TOTAL
1535 points/W
6059 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
3274 points/GHz
6600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4199 points/GHz
5992 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
931 points/GHz
1391 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
788 points/GHz
1571 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
15554 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4