Athlon X4 950 vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The 950 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 99.8 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 99.8 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
810f81
Core
Bristol Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
34.93k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
99.8k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
950
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.44k
13.02k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
20.56k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.54k
4.81k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
5.43k (x1.81)
TOTAL
34.93k
43.82k (x1.25)
Multithread
950
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
40.75k
27.29k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
42.07k
49.37k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.53k
13.57k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
5.61k (x1.26)
TOTAL
99.8k
95.84k (x0.96)
Performance/W
950
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
627 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
647 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
193 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
1535 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
3274 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4199 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
931 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
788 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4