Athlon X4 760K vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.7 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.7 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
206d7
Core
Richland
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
8 /16
TDP
100 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
8.76k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
7.35k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
3.86k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.32k (x0.95)
TOTAL
24.6k
23.28k (x0.95)
Multithread
760K
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
78.51k (x4.31)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
66.46k (x3.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
36.42k (x4.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.88k (x1.01)
TOTAL
49.8k
185.26k (x3.72)
Performance/W
760K
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4