Athlon X4 760K vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 11.1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 11.1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
306e4
Core
Richland
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
10 /20
TDP
100 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
25600 kB
Date
June 2013
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
551.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
10.55k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
10.02k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
3.99k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.66k (x1.05)
TOTAL
24.6k
28.23k (x1.15)
Multithread
760K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
215.04k (x11.82)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
230.43k (x11.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
96.87k (x11.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
8.76k (x2.27)
TOTAL
49.8k
551.1k (x11.07)
Performance/W
760K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
4792 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4