Athlon X4 760K vs Core i7-5820K
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 2.6 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 2.6 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
306f2
Core
Richland
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
100 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
15360 kB
Date
June 2013
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
129.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
12.03k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
11.23k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
4.55k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.72k (x1.07)
TOTAL
24.6k
31.53k (x1.28)
Multithread
760K
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
49.48k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
52.21k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
19.7k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
7.67k (x1.99)
TOTAL
49.8k
129.06k (x2.59)
Performance/W
760K
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
353 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
373 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
922 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
3119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
8759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4