Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
306d4
Core
Richland
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /4
TDP
100 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
68.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
8.48k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
12.03k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
3.32k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.79k (x0.8)
TOTAL
24.6k
26.62k (x1.08)
Multithread
760K
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
15.19k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
25.99k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
6.71k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
2.96k (x0.77)
TOTAL
49.8k
50.85k (x1.02)
Performance/W
760K
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
1013 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
1733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
3390 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
3140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
9860 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4