Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-2400
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i5-2400 gets 84.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.7 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i5-2400 gets 84.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.7 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
206a7
Core
Richland
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
100 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
25.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
84.36k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
9.16k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
8.2k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
3.95k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
4.17k (x1.2)
TOTAL
24.6k
25.49k (x1.04)
Multithread
760K
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
34.74k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
31.07k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
14.86k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.69k (x0.96)
TOTAL
49.8k
84.36k (x1.69)
Performance/W
760K
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
327 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
888 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
2695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
2411 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
1228 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
7497 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4