Athlon X4 760K vs Core i3-7100U
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i3-7100U gets 60.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.2 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i3-7100U gets 60.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.2 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
806e9
Core
Richland
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
100 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2013
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
79.6k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
8.76k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
13.49k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
3.21k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.9k (x1.12)
TOTAL
24.6k
29.36k (x1.19)
Multithread
760K
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
18.33k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
31.08k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
7.5k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.61k (x0.93)
TOTAL
49.8k
60.52k (x1.22)
Performance/W
760K
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
1222 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
2072 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
500 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
240 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
4035 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
1624 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
12235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4