Athlon X4 760K vs Core i3-6100U
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i3-6100U gets 56.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100U is 1.1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the i3-6100U gets 56.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100U is 1.1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
406e3
Core
Richland
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
100 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
69.94k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
8.06k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
12.85k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
3.14k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
4.01k (x1.15)
TOTAL
24.6k
28.06k (x1.14)
Multithread
760K
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
16.58k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
28.88k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
7.38k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.82k (x0.99)
TOTAL
49.8k
56.66k (x1.14)
Performance/W
760K
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
1925 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
492 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
254 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
3777 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
3506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
1742 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
12201 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4