Athlon X4 760K vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the 3500U gets 146.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.9 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the 3500U gets 146.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.9 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
810f81
Core
Richland
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
100 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
140.97k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
11.1k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
18.97k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
3.9k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.39k (x0.97)
TOTAL
24.6k
37.37k (x1.52)
Multithread
760K
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
45.74k (x2.51)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
75.47k (x3.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
21.89k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.49k (x0.91)
TOTAL
49.8k
146.6k (x2.94)
Performance/W
760K
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
3049 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
5032 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
1459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
233 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
9773 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
5128 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
1053 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
916 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
10099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4