Athlon X4 760K vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.8 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.8 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
810f10
Core
Richland
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
100 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
198.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
13.04k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
22.35k (x2.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
5.37k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.4k (x0.98)
TOTAL
24.6k
44.15k (x1.79)
Multithread
760K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
56.49k (x3.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
100.74k (x5.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
28.21k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.04k (x0.79)
TOTAL
49.8k
188.49k (x3.78)
Performance/W
760K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
2900 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4