Athlon X4 760K vs FX 8350
Description
Both models 760K and 8350 are based on Piledriver architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.4 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.4 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
600f20
Core
Richland
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
100 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2013
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
9.85k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
8.41k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
3.58k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
6.32k (x1.82)
TOTAL
24.6k
28.16k (x1.14)
Multithread
760K
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
44.93k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
45.21k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
22.81k (x2.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
5.19k (x1.35)
TOTAL
49.8k
118.14k (x2.37)
Performance/W
760K
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4