Athlon X4 760K vs A6 7400K
Description
The 760K is based on Piledriver architecture while the 7400K is based on Steamroller.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the 7400K gets 34.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 760K is 1.5 times faster than the 7400K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 760K gets a score of 49.8 k points while the 7400K gets 34.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 760K is 1.5 times faster than the 7400K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
630f01
Core
Richland
Kaveri
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
Socket FM2+
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
100 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x16+2x64 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
June 2013
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
24.6k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.8k points
34.28k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
760K
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.53k
8.78k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
8.14k
9.45k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.45k
3.39k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.39k (x0.69)
TOTAL
24.6k
24.01k (x0.98)
Multithread
760K
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.2k
13.5k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
12.17k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.42k
5.96k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
2.65k (x0.69)
TOTAL
49.8k
34.28k (x0.69)
Performance/W
760K
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
208 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
187 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
92 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
498 points/W
527 points/W
Performance/GHz
760K
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
2324 points/GHz
2252 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1986 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/GHz
869 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
612 points/GHz
TOTAL
6001 points/GHz
6156 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4