Athlon II X2 260 vs Celeron N4020
Description
The 260 is based on K10 architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.1 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 260 gets a score of 27.5 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.1 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f63
706a8
Core
Regor
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.05k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
25.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
260
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
5.14k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
7.89k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.87k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
1.76k (x1.04)
TOTAL
17.05k
17.67k (x1.04)
Multithread
260
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
10.02k
7.46k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
11.61k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
4.27k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
1.91k (x0.85)
TOTAL
27.54k
25.26k (x0.92)
Performance/W
260
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
154 points/W
1244 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
1936 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78 points/W
712 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
4211 points/W
Performance/GHz
260
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
1837 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
1026 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
630 points/GHz
TOTAL
5328 points/GHz
6309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4