Athlon II M300 vs Core 2 Duo T7250
Description
The M300 is based on K10 architecture while the T7250 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the M300 is 1.3 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the M300 is 1.3 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f62
6fd
Core
Caspian
Merom
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket S1G3
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2009
September 2007
Mean monothread perf.
9.57k points
7.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.73k points
13.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
M300
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
2.66k
2.27k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
3.84k
2.07k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.97k
2.01k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.1k
1.22k (x1.11)
TOTAL
9.57k
7.57k (x0.79)
Multithread
M300
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
5.04k
4.51k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
7.46k
4.09k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.75k
3.9k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.48k
1.32k (x0.89)
TOTAL
17.73k
13.82k (x0.78)
Performance/W
M300
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
144 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
213 points/W
117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
506 points/W
395 points/W
Performance/GHz
M300
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1328 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
550 points/GHz
611 points/GHz
TOTAL
4784 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4