Athlon II M300 vs Celeron J1900
Description
The M300 is based on K10 architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.9 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.9 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f62
30679
Core
Caspian
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
Socket S1G3
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2009
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
9.57k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.73k points
33.25k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
M300
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
2.66k
4.58k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
3.84k
2.32k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.97k
1.72k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.1k
1.14k (x1.03)
TOTAL
9.57k
9.75k (x1.02)
Multithread
M300
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
5.04k
17.16k (x3.41)
Test#2 (FP)
7.46k
8.42k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.75k
6.22k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.48k
1.44k (x0.98)
TOTAL
17.73k
33.25k (x1.88)
Performance/W
M300
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
144 points/W
1716 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
213 points/W
842 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107 points/W
622 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
506 points/W
3325 points/W
Performance/GHz
M300
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1328 points/GHz
1893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
550 points/GHz
470 points/GHz
TOTAL
4784 points/GHz
4029 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4