Athlon II M300 vs A6 3500
Description
Both models M300 and 3500 are based on K10 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.8 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M300 gets a score of 17.7 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.8 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100f62
300f10
Core
Caspian
Llano
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket S1G3
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
3/3
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x128 kB
3x64+3x64 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
3x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2009
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
9.57k points
13.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.73k points
32.72k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
M300
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.66k
4.75k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
3.84k
4.72k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.97k
2.49k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.1k
1.69k (x1.54)
TOTAL
9.57k
13.65k (x1.43)
Multithread
M300
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
5.04k
12.56k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
7.46k
12.58k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.75k
6.08k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.48k
1.49k (x1.01)
TOTAL
17.73k
32.72k (x1.85)
Performance/W
M300
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
144 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
213 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107 points/W
93 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
23 points/W
TOTAL
506 points/W
503 points/W
Performance/GHz
M300
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
1328 points/GHz
1978 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
550 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
4784 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4