Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Atom x5-Z8350
Description
The TK-42 is based on K8 architecture while the x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the x5-Z8350 gets 18 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 1.4 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the x5-Z8350 gets 18 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 1.4 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
60f82
406c4
Core
Tyler
Cherry Trail
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.44 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.72 GHz
Socket
Socket S1g1
BGA592
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
20 W
2 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
June 2009
February 2016
Mean monothread perf.
6.28k points
6.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.91k points
17.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
TK-42
x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.06k
3.12k (x2.94)
Test#2 (FP)
2.91k
1.77k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.43k
1.13k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
0.66k (x0.74)
TOTAL
6.28k
6.67k (x1.06)
Multithread
TK-42
x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
4.02k
8.49k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
5.2k
5.26k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
3.3k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
0.94k (x0.94)
TOTAL
12.91k
17.99k (x1.39)
Performance/W
TK-42
x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
201 points/W
4246 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
260 points/W
2629 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
1649 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
470 points/W
TOTAL
645 points/W
8995 points/W
Performance/GHz
TK-42
x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
662 points/GHz
1812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1819 points/GHz
1031 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
891 points/GHz
655 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/GHz
382 points/GHz
TOTAL
3927 points/GHz
3880 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4