Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Atom N270
Description
The TK-42 is based on K8 architecture while the N270 is based on Bonnell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the N270 gets 4.4 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 2.9 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the TK-42 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the N270 gets 4.4 k points.
Summarizing, the TK-42 is 2.9 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
60f82
106c2
Core
Tyler
Diamondville
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket S1g1
BGA 437
Cores/Threads
2/2
1 /2
TDP
20 W
3 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
512 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
June 2009
June 2008
Mean monothread perf.
6.28k points
3.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.91k points
4.43k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
TK-42
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
1.06k
1.02k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
2.91k
0.85k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.43k
0.93k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
0.37k (x0.42)
TOTAL
6.28k
3.18k (x0.51)
Multithread
TK-42
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
4.02k
1.31k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
5.2k
1.36k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
1.33k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
0.42k (x0.42)
TOTAL
12.91k
4.43k (x0.34)
Performance/W
TK-42
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
201 points/W
437 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
260 points/W
454 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
645 points/W
1477 points/W
Performance/GHz
TK-42
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
662 points/GHz
638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1819 points/GHz
534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
891 points/GHz
580 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/GHz
234 points/GHz
TOTAL
3927 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4