Athlon 5150 APU vs Core i3-3110M
Description
The 5150 APU is based on Jaguar architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5150 APU gets a score of 30.1 k points while the i3-3110M gets 33.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.1 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5150 APU gets a score of 30.1 k points while the i3-3110M gets 33.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.1 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
306a9
Core
Kabini
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
AM1
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
25 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
256 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2014
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
8.26k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.06k points
33.81k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5150 APU
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.02k
6.03k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
2.62k
6.6k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.59k
2.31k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.02k
2.08k (x2.04)
TOTAL
8.26k
17.03k (x2.06)
Multithread
5150 APU
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.06k
12.52k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
10.42k
13.71k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.32k
5.16k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
2.43k (x1.93)
TOTAL
30.06k
33.81k (x1.12)
Performance/W
5150 APU
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
483 points/W
358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
417 points/W
392 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
147 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
69 points/W
TOTAL
1203 points/W
966 points/W
Performance/GHz
5150 APU
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
1890 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1637 points/GHz
2748 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
964 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
639 points/GHz
868 points/GHz
TOTAL
5162 points/GHz
7095 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4