Athlon 5150 APU vs E1 2500
Description
Both models 5150 APU and 2500 are based on Jaguar architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5150 APU gets a score of 30.1 k points while the 2500 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5150 APU is 3.3 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5150 APU gets a score of 30.1 k points while the 2500 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5150 APU is 3.3 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
700f01
Core
Kabini
Kabini
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.4 GHz
Socket
AM1
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
256 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
April 2014
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
8.26k points
6.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.06k points
9.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5150 APU
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.02k
2.35k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
2.62k
2.21k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.59k
1.24k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.02k
0.84k (x0.82)
TOTAL
8.26k
6.64k (x0.8)
Multithread
5150 APU
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.06k
3.3k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
10.42k
3.21k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.32k
1.76k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
0.87k (x0.69)
TOTAL
30.06k
9.13k (x0.3)
Performance/W
5150 APU
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
483 points/W
220 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
417 points/W
214 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
117 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1203 points/W
609 points/W
Performance/GHz
5150 APU
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
1890 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1637 points/GHz
1581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
639 points/GHz
600 points/GHz
TOTAL
5162 points/GHz
4745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4