Athlon 5150 APU vs A6 7310
Description
The 5150 APU is based on Jaguar architecture while the 7310 is based on Puma.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5150 APU gets a score of 30.1 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.2 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5150 APU gets a score of 30.1 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.2 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
730f01
Core
Kabini
Carrizo-L
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
AM1
FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
25 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
256 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
April 2014
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
8.26k points
11.17k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.06k points
35.87k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5150 APU
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
3.02k
4.08k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
2.62k
3.76k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.59k
2.21k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.02k
1.12k (x1.1)
TOTAL
8.26k
11.17k (x1.35)
Multithread
5150 APU
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
12.06k
13.38k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
10.42k
13.51k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.32k
7.39k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.26k
1.59k (x1.26)
TOTAL
30.06k
35.87k (x1.19)
Performance/W
5150 APU
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
483 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
417 points/W
540 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
296 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1203 points/W
1435 points/W
Performance/GHz
5150 APU
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
1890 points/GHz
1700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1637 points/GHz
1566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
921 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
639 points/GHz
467 points/GHz
TOTAL
5162 points/GHz
4654 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4