A9 9425 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The 9425 is based on Excavator architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 5.7 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 5.7 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
406f1
Core
Stoney Ridge
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2018
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
12.16k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
11.82k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
3.02k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
2.4k (x1.07)
TOTAL
31.31k
29.39k (x0.94)
Multithread
9425
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
103.77k (x6.26)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
102.28k (x5.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
26.13k (x5.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
5.65k (x2.53)
TOTAL
41.73k
237.83k (x5.7)
Performance/W
9425
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4