A9 9425 vs Core E5-2620 v3
Description
The 9425 is based on Excavator architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 8.6 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 8.6 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306f2
Core
Stoney Ridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
15360 kB
Date
May 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
18.64k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
10.55k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
4.12k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
2.54k (x1.13)
TOTAL
31.31k
35.86k (x1.15)
Multithread
9425
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
181.66k (x10.96)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
122.09k (x6.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
47.02k (x9.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
7.22k (x3.24)
TOTAL
41.73k
357.99k (x8.58)
Performance/W
9425
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4