A9 9425 vs Core i5-8350U
Description
The 9425 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 2.7 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 2.7 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
806ea
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2018
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
38.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
112.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
16.74k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
14.66k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
2.79k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
4.12k (x1.84)
TOTAL
31.31k
38.31k (x1.22)
Multithread
9425
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
51.05k (x3.08)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
45.59k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
10.69k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
4.78k (x2.15)
TOTAL
41.73k
112.12k (x2.69)
Performance/W
9425
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
3403 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
3039 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
7475 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
4650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
4071 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
10642 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4