A9 9425 vs Core i3-8145U
Description
The 9425 is based on Excavator architecture while the i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1.8 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1.8 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
806eb
Core
Stoney Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2018
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
34.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
75.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
17.78k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
12.8k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
2.61k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
1.3k (x0.58)
TOTAL
31.31k
34.48k (x1.1)
Multithread
9425
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
28.06k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
34.83k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
9.69k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
2.55k (x1.15)
TOTAL
41.73k
75.13k (x1.8)
Performance/W
9425
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
2322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
5008 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
4558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
3281 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
669 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
332 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
8840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4