A9 9425 vs Athlon X4 950
Description
Both models 9425 and 950 are based on Excavator architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 2.4 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 950 is 2.4 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
660f51
Core
Stoney Ridge
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
May 2018
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
950
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
12.44k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
15.96k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
3.54k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
3k (x1.34)
TOTAL
31.31k
34.93k (x1.12)
Multithread
9425
950
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
40.75k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
42.07k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
12.53k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
4.45k (x2)
TOTAL
41.73k
99.8k (x2.39)
Performance/W
9425
950
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
950
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4