A9 9425 vs 9420
Description
Both models 9425 and 9420 are based on Excavator architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.1 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.1 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
670f00
Core
Stoney Ridge
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
May 2018
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
46.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
11.74k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
16.05k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
3.26k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
2.05k (x0.92)
TOTAL
31.31k
33.09k (x1.06)
Multithread
9425
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
18.57k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
20.11k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
5.27k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
2.38k (x1.07)
TOTAL
41.73k
46.33k (x1.11)
Performance/W
9425
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
1238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
352 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
159 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
3089 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
4458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
570 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
9192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4