A9 9425 vs Mobile 3020e
Description
The 9425 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.3 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9425 gets a score of 41.7 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.3 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
820f01
Core
Stoney Ridge
Dali
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.31k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.73k points
52.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9425
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
9.28k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
14.7k
14.56k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
3.44k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
2.06k (x0.92)
TOTAL
31.31k
29.34k (x0.94)
Multithread
9425
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
15.75k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
28.63k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
5.87k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
2.17k (x0.97)
TOTAL
41.73k
52.42k (x1.26)
Performance/W
9425
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1189 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
148 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
2782 points/W
8737 points/W
Performance/GHz
9425
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
3034 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
605 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
8461 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4