| | | | | | |

A9 9420 vs Core i7-5820K


Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 4.9 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
306f2
Core
Stoney Ridge
Haswell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
15360 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
129.06k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
9420
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
3.82k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
9.97k
9.64k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.96k
4.29k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
3.78k (x1.78)
TOTAL
17.61k
21.53k (x1.22)

Multithread

9420

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
18.07k (x4.65)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
64.25k (x6.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
27.03k (x6.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.74k
8.03k (x4.62)
TOTAL
18.79k
117.38k (x6.25)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9420
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.55k
12.03k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
11.23k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
4.55k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
3.72k (x1.71)
TOTAL
26.74k
31.53k (x1.18)

Multithread

9420

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.09k
49.48k (x5.44)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
52.21k (x4.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
19.7k (x6.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
7.67k (x4.24)
TOTAL
26.15k
129.06k (x4.94)

Performance/W
9420
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
353 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
817 points/W
373 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
200 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
1743 points/W
922 points/W

Performance/GHz
9420
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
2096 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3862 points/GHz
3119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
864 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
604 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
7427 points/GHz
8759 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4