A9 9420 vs Core i7-5500U
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-5500U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the i7-5500U gets 82.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5500U is 1.8 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 46.3 k points while the i7-5500U gets 82.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5500U is 1.8 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306d4
Core
Stoney Ridge
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
40.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
82.89k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
3.31k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
9.97k
11.61k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.96k
3.94k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
3.24k (x1.53)
TOTAL
17.61k
22.1k (x1.26)
Multithread
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
5.97k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
25.54k (x2.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
8.8k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.74k
3.36k (x1.93)
TOTAL
18.79k
43.67k (x2.32)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.41k
10.59k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
11.48k
13.72k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.29k
4.22k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
3.64k (x1.63)
TOTAL
25.41k
32.16k (x1.27)
Multithread
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.25k
20.8k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
13.69k
30.44k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.09k
9.1k (x4.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.87k
3.35k (x1.79)
TOTAL
28.89k
63.69k (x2.2)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.55k
10.37k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
14.25k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
4.07k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
3.12k (x1.43)
TOTAL
26.74k
31.81k (x1.19)
Multithread
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.09k
20.93k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
33.87k (x2.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
8.98k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
3.35k (x1.85)
TOTAL
26.15k
67.13k (x2.57)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.74k
17.76k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
16.05k
14.9k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.26k
4.17k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
3.58k (x1.75)
TOTAL
33.09k
40.41k (x1.22)
Multithread
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
34.9k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.11k
35.07k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
9.28k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
3.64k (x1.53)
TOTAL
46.33k
82.89k (x1.79)
Performance/W
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1238 points/W
2327 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1340 points/W
2338 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
352 points/W
619 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
159 points/W
243 points/W
TOTAL
3089 points/W
5526 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3260 points/GHz
5920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4458 points/GHz
4966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
905 points/GHz
1390 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
570 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
TOTAL
9192 points/GHz
13469 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4