A9 9420 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 28.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 2.2 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 28.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 2.2 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
906c0
Core
Stoney Ridge
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9420
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.41k
9.83k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
11.48k
9.74k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.29k
3.65k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.24k
3.88k (x1.74)
TOTAL
25.41k
27.1k (x1.07)
Multithread
9420
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.25k
25.04k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
13.69k
24.7k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.09k
9.29k (x4.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.87k
5.06k (x2.71)
TOTAL
28.89k
64.09k (x2.22)
Performance/W
9420
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
750 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
139 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
1926 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2336 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3188 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
621 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
7058 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4